|
Calcium
Silicate
An Effective and Beneficial Thermal Insulation
by
Ms. Rupa Z. Vadodaria, Ketan A. Shah and H. V. Shah
Megha Insulations Pvt. Ltd., Bhavnagar, INDIA
Summary
Thermal
Insulation slows down the rate of heat flow and minimizes
losses. In face of increasing energy costs, industries
have to improve efficiency and profitability to survive the
pressures of globalization. Calcium Silicate insulation cuts
energy costs and helps in achieving this goal faster.1
Introduction
The need for efficient thermal
insulation has increased with increased energy cost. An ideal
thermal insulation has low mass, high strength and low thermal
conductivity coupled with high service temperature. It reduces
heat loss and thereby saves energy significantly and serves
several functions such as:
-
Better control of temperature
-
Reduction of startup heating load (in batch processes)
-
Increase in production
-
Fire protection
-
Better working conditions
-
Reduction in thermal spalling in refractory lining, etc.
Rupa Z. Vadodaria is a Chemical Engineer and currently studying
for Masters in Engineering Management at Drexel University, Philadelphia, USA.
Ketan A. Shah is a Civil Engineer and currently studying forMBA at Kellogg School of Management,
Evanston, IL, USA.
H. V. Shah is a Chairman of Megha Insulations Pvt. Ltd.,A-11/6th floor, Dadasaheb
Flats Kalanala,
Bhavnagar-364 001, INDIA (Phone: +91-98252-07723)
Conventional insulation like Vermiculite and Mica bricks with a bulk density about 1000 kg/m3 have high strength but poor insulating characteristics. Flexible Insulation such as Mineral Wool and Ceramic Wool, has low mass
and thermal conductivity (equivalent to Calcium Silicate) but no inherent strength and is
compressible. 2,3
Calcium Silicate insulation is a unique and versatile insulation offering the thermal efficiency of flexible insulation and the strength of Conventional Insulation Bricks up to 1000 °C temperature. It has a long life and once
installed requires hardly any maintenance. As a thumb rule, wherever refractory bricks are being used, CSI may be used as a backup layer. Table 1 shows product properties vs. relevant IS and ASTM standards.4
Cost Performance Data For Various Process TemperaturesWe have calculated heat losses and surface temperature data at various process temperatures using NAIMA, U.S.A.’s 3E plus program5. The details are:
|
Assumptions
|
| Process temperatures, °C
: |
1000, 800, 600 and 400 °C |
|
Area
: |
Vertical flat |
| Ambient
temperature
: |
32 °C |
| Wind velocity
: |
0 Kmph |
| Outside
surface emittance : |
0.9 (All service jacket) |
Conversion
Factor
1 Btu/sq.ft./hr. = 0.252 Kcal/sq.ft./hr.
= 0.252 x 10.764 x 8040 Kcal/Sq.m. for 8040 hrs
(335 working days)
= 0.0218 Mil.
KCal/Sq.m. for 8040 hours
Current
Price:
|
Cost of heat energy |
Case to case basis |
| Cost of Calcium Silicate insulation
: |
Rs. 650/- for 50 mm. thickness/
m2 |
| Cost of Calcium Silicate insulation
: |
Rs.
1248/- for 100 mm. thickness/ m2 |
| Cost of Calcium Silicate insulation
: |
Rs.
1755/- for 150 mm. thickness/ m2 |
| Cost of Calcium Silicate insulation
: |
Rs.
2236/- for 200 mm. thickness/ m2 |
The system of mathematical heat flux and thermal performance equations used in this analysis has been accepted by A.S.T.M., U.S.A. and calculated using
NAIMA, U.S.A.’s 3E plus program. Information is based on laboratory condition and as applicable for normal systems. Actual values may vary depending on the service
conditions 5.
Table 2 and Graphs 1 & 2 shows outside surface temperature, heat loss and costeconomics for CSI at various process temperatures. It shows that higher the thickness of CSI; the lower is the heat loss and greater the savings in energy. Even using 100 mm. thickness of CSI is beneficial for process temperature 400 °C where at surface temperature 55 °C value of heat lost (based on use of steam coal) is more as compared to cost of insulation.
Conventional Insulation Brick vs. Calcium Silicate Insulation
A cement plant using 114 mm. Refractory Brick + 100 mm. Conventional Insulation Brick has replaced Conventional Insulation Brick with Calcium Silicate
insulation. Table 3 shows surface temperature and heat loss data for gas
temperatures of 950 °C and 850 °C.
Results show that Calcium Silicate insulation saves energy significant & pay-back period is less than 2 months, higher thickness is recommended.
Sandwich Insulation : Ceramic Fibre + CSI up to 1400 °C
For higher temperature up to 1400 °C, Ceramic Fibre backed by CSI will provide high benefit cost ratio to the user in comparison with any other insulation product.
Table 4 shows surface temperature, heat loss and cost performance data for Ceramic Fibre and CSI at various process temperatures.
Use of hollow refractory box or hollow CSI box in required shape and size containing
Calcium Silicate insulation in Powder form will be most cost beneficial.
General
M/s. Saurashtra Cement Ltd., Ranavav, Gujarat state, has insulated their plant equipment using our Calcium Silicate insulation Materials. They have reported savingof fuel and electrical energy value Rs. 11 crores per annum (1998-99). M/s. SCL have been presented the National Award for best improvements in thermal energy
performance for the year 1998-99 at the 7th NCB international seminar on Cement and Building Materials held on 21.11.2000 at Delhi6.
M/s. IDBI and M/s. USAID have carried out energy surveys in cement plants thru M/s. Holtec Engineers, Cement Consultants, New Delhi, INDIA and M/s. Resource Management Association, Wisconsin, U.S.A. (1995). Their report confirms that thermal energy and electric power consumption savings of 15 % is available to the Indian Cement sector. Therefore, investing in energy efficiency can be as profitable as investing in increased
production capacity7.
A cement plant manufacturing 1 million tons of cement consumes about 1.80 lac tons of steam coal per year. By using CSI - about 265 tons value Rs. 1.2 crore - it is possible to save 27,000 tons of steam coal value about
Rs. 7 crores per year.
M/s. HINDALCO has started using CSI in their electrolytic cells reducing electrical energy consumption from 18000 unit to less than 14000 unit saving
4000 unit (KWH) (estimated value Rs. 15000) per ton of aluminium metal produced.
M/s. Bokaro Steel Plant, M/s. B.H.E.L., M/s. Saint Gobain Glass (India) Ltd., Steel Rolling Mills & Others have also benefited considerably.
Significant fuel savings can be obtained in various industries including power plants, petrochemicals, refineries, fertilizers, ceramics, etc. who use thermal equipments.
Environmental and Economic Thickness of Insulation
CSI decreases fuel consumption and thereby reduces emission of carbon dioxide, oxide ofnitrogen etc. minimizing environmental impacts. Carbon reduction input & economic thickness of insulation can be calculated for individual cases based on:
- Size and material of construction of thermal equipment (In general, thicker the material, higher the heat storage and startup loads and lower the heat loss)
- Working temperature / peak temperatures (Higher temperatures lead to higherlosses due to larger temperature gradients)
-
Quality, thickness and thermal properties of refractory material being used (Heat loss will vary depending upon insulating properties, thickness, porosity and density of materials used)
- Wind speed and ambient temperature around the equipment (higher the wind speed
and lower the ambient temperatures, more will be the heat loss.)
- Working hours per year, Batch operation versus continuous operation.
- Calorific value and cost of fuel (Higher the cost of the fuel, more benefits can be derived using even smaller thickness of insulation), etc.
Conclusion
With rapidly increasing energy costs combined with competitive globalization, all Industries have to face the challenge of improving the quality and winning the price wars to create or sustain profits for future growth. Continuous energy conservation program based on collection & analysis of data and implementation of energy savingmeasures will help in achieving this goal faster.
(Note: We will be glad to help you cut your energy cost. Please send us details of your thermal equipment to enable us to suggest how CSI can effectively help you conserve expensive thermal (heat) energy).
References
-
Catalog of Megha Insulations Pvt. Ltd. and website:
www.meghainsulation.com
(Phone: 0091-278-411523/526/728), INDIA.
-
Ketan A. Shah, Role of Insulation in Thermal Energy Conservation, at a seminar on Energy Management “The New Imperative” organized by the Confederation of
Indian Industry (CII) at Ahmedabad
(1997).
-
Rupa Z. Vadodaria, Industrial Insulators, Project Report, L.D. Engg. College, Ahmedabad (1997)
-
BIS, INDIA, Standard IS 9428 & ASTM, USA, Vol. 6, Standard C533-90
-
NAIMA (North American Insulation Manufacturers Association), USA’s 3E plusprogramme
-
Cement. Vol. XXXIV, No. 2, Page 33
-
Resource Management Associates of Madison, Inc., USA., circular: “India’s Cement Industry offers Concrete opportunities for Energy Savings and increased profits 1995.” (Phone:001-608-283-2880)
Table
1 : Product Properties vs. Relevant Standards
"SONASIL"
- Calcium Silicate Insulation (CSI)
SONASIL is
available in the form of Blocks, Pipe sections, Segments and
Powder
|
Properties |
IS 9428 |
ASTM C 533:90 |
SONASIL Grade: |
|
Type I |
Type II |
800 |
1000 |
|
Temperature (°C), max. |
950 |
649 |
871 |
800 |
1000 |
|
Bulk Density (kg/m3)
|
|
(max.) |
(max.) |
8-11
|
8-11
|
|
Test
Values: |
200-320 |
240 |
240 |
220-270
|
230-275
|
|
Avg.
value: |
220-280 |
|
|
|
|
Compressive strength, Length/Width:
kN/m2 : |
|
|
|
|
|
Dry, under a
load
of 415
kN/m2 : |
5 %
|
5 %
|
5 %
|
3% |
3% |
Wet,
under a load
of 170 kN/m2, after 18 hrs. of
immersion
in water |
5 %
|
- |
- |
3.5 % |
3.5 % |
|
Dry, under a load of 345 kN/m2, after 24 hrs. heat soak : |
5 %
|
- |
- |
3.5 % |
3.5 % |
|
Flexural Strength
(kN/m2),min. |
240 |
310 |
310 |
400 |
400 |
|
Heat Resistance after heat
soak at max. temp. for 24 hrs. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Linear shrinkage (length), |
|
|
|
|
|
|
max. : |
2% |
2% |
2.5% |
2% |
2% |
|
typical : |
- |
- |
- |
1.6% |
1.8% |
|
Loss in mass, max. |
1.5% |
- |
- |
15% |
15% |
|
Thermal Conductivity
(W/mk),
max. at mean temp. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 °C |
0.080 |
0.079 |
0.095 |
0.070 |
0.080
|
|
300 °C |
0.097 |
0.095 |
0.110 |
0.080 |
0.090
|
|
400 °C |
0.121 |
- |
0.136 |
- |
0.105 |
|
500 °C |
0.148 |
- |
- |
- |
0.120 |
|
Cold Crushing Strength
(CCS), (N/mm2), min. |
- |
- |
- |
1.4 |
1.5 |
* ASTM thermal conductivity values correspond to mean temperatures of
204, 316 and 427 ° C.
December,2001
Table 1 : Product Properties vs. Relevant Standards
(contd.)
"SONASIL" - Calcium Silicate Insulation Materials (CSI)
SONASIL is available in the form of Blocks, Pipe sections, Segments and Powder
|
Properties |
IS 9428 |
ASTM C 533:90 |
SONASIL Grade: |
|
Type I |
Type II |
800 |
1000 |
|
Moisture Content(%),
max. |
7.5 |
- |
- |
7.5 |
7.5 |
| Alkalinity, pH
|
8-11 |
- |
- |
8-11
|
8-11
|
Dimensional
Tolerance (mm.): |
|
|
|
|
|
Length/Width:
kN/m2 : |
± 3
|
± 3.2
|
± 3.2
|
±2 |
±2 |
Thickness:
|
-1.5,+3
|
± 3.2 |
± 3.2 |
-1.5,+2 |
-1.5,+2 |
Pipe
inside
diameter: |
-0,+5
|
- |
- |
-0,+5 |
-0,+5 |
Chemical Properties: SONASIL is resistant to reduction gases, e.g. moist air, organic solvent vapors, protective gases (N2, inert gases), reducing atmospheres (H2, CO, CH4, NH3) etc.
Note: Tests are performed to relevant standards. Values given in catalog are typical values obtained from lab specimens under standard test conditions and are not for use as maxima or minima in specifications.
|
Conversion to conventional units |
1 Kcal/m. hr °C
hr.°C
|
=
= |
6.933 Btu.in/ft2
1.163
W/m°K
|
|
1 Kg/m3 |
= |
0.06243 Lb/ft3 |
|
1 KN/m2 |
= |
0.145 Lb/in2 |
IS 9428 refers to relevant Indian Standard
ASTM C 533: 90 refers to relevant American Standard of Testing and
Materials, U.S.A.
December,
2001
Table 2
: Heat Loss, Surface Temp. and Cost Data for CSI at
|
Process
Temp. 1000 °C |
|
CSI Thickness mm. |
CSI, Outside
Surface Temp.°C |
|
CSI, Outside Surface Heat
Loss |
|
Btu/hr.
per sq.ft. |
Mil. Kcalper M² per 8040
hrs. |
| 50 |
151 |
304 |
602 |
13.12 |
| 100 |
105 |
221 |
309 |
6.74 |
| 150 |
86 |
186 |
208 |
4.53 |
| 200 |
76 |
157 |
157 |
3.42 |
|
Process
Temp. 800 °C |
| 50 |
123 |
254 |
417 |
9.09 |
| 100 |
87 |
189 |
215 |
4.69 |
| 150 |
72 |
162 |
145 |
3.16 |
| 200 |
64 |
147 |
109 |
2.38 |
|
Process
Temp. 600 °C |
| 50 |
97 |
206 |
264 |
5.76 |
| 100 |
70 |
158 |
136 |
2.96 |
| 150 |
59 |
139 |
92 |
2.01 |
|
Process
Temp. 400 °C |
| 50 |
72 |
161 |
143 |
3.12 |
| 100 |
55 |
131 |
74 |
1.61 |


Table 3
: Heat Loss & Surface Temperature data for
Refractory + Insulation Brick versus Refractory + Calcium Silicate
Insulation
|
At gas
temperature : 950 °C |
|
Refractory
mm. |
Insulation
Brick mm. |
Calcium
Silicate Insulation, mm. |
Outside SurfaceTemperature |
Outside Surface Heat Loss
|
|
°F |
°C |
Btu/hr.
per sq.ft. |
Mil.
KCal/M²
per 8040 hrs. |
| 114 |
100 |
-- |
337 |
169 |
741 |
16.15 |
| 114 |
-- |
100 |
200 |
93 |
247 |
5.38 |
| We
suggest: |
| 114 |
-- |
150 |
173 |
78 |
174 |
3.79 |
|
At gas
temperature : 850 °C |
| 114 |
100 |
-- |
317 |
158 |
657 |
14.23 |
| 114 |
-- |
100 |
186 |
86 |
208 |
4.53 |
| We
suggest: |
| 114 |
100 |
150 |
162 |
72 |
146 |
3.18 |
Advantages of using Calcium Silicate Insulation (CSI) vs. Insulation Brick
(CIB):
Table 4 :
Surface temperature, Heat loss & Cost performance data for
Sandwich
Insulation: Ceramic Fibre + Calcium Silicate Insulation
Process
Temp.°C
at
|
Ceramic
Fibre Thick,
inch.
|
|
Interface Temp.°C
|
Outside
Surface
Temp. °C
|
Outside Surface Heat Loss
|
Cost
per Sq.Ft. of |
|
HTZ
128 kg./M³
|
Thick
inch
Board
|
Btu/hr.
per
sq.ft.
|
Mil.
KCal/M²
per8040 hrs.
|
%
age
Addi-
tional
saving
|
Ceramic
fibre
Rs. per
Sq.Ft.
|
CSI
Rs. per
Sq.Ft.
|
Total
cost
Rs. per
Sq.Ft.
|
| 1400 |
12 |
0 |
-- |
76 |
162 |
3.53 |
-- |
493 |
0 |
493 |
| |
6 |
6 |
826 |
74 |
152 |
3.31 |
6.17 |
267 |
151 |
418 |
| |
12 |
0 |
-- |
72 |
145 |
3.16 |
-- |
493 |
0 |
493 |
| 1250 |
6 |
6 |
763 |
70 |
134 |
2.92 |
7.59 |
267 |
151 |
418 |
| |
4 |
8 |
917 |
70 |
134 |
2.92 |
7.59 |
191 |
| |